Supplier intelligence platform · For procurement teams

Supplier intelligence for the companies behind your supplier list.

Match suppliers to legal entities, monitor available status, ownership and financial-filing records, and turn supported changes into sourced briefings for procurement to review.

Focused on company-record evidence. Use your existing systems for delivery performance, cyber, ESG, sanctions and spend exposure.

Δ   Supplier portfolioIllustrative example
A connection worth understanding

Three suppliers.
One recorded shareholder.

N
Northstar ManufacturingOwnership change detected
40% → 65%
M
Meridian ComponentsAlder Holdings · recorded shareholder
100%
W
Westhaven LogisticsAlder Holdings · recorded shareholder
80%
Review prepared

Onboarding is a starting point.
Companies keep changing.

A supplier’s company record can change between reviews. Bring those changes back into your supplier due diligence process, with the context needed to decide what deserves attention.

Follow the legal entity

Track company status, registered details, directors and officers against the supplier’s official company identifier.

Understand the relationships

Explore recorded shareholders and group structures. See where different suppliers share a corporate connection.

Bring new filings into view

Know when financial statements become available. Compare reported figures with their periods, currency and source.

Coverage, available fields and change history depend on the country and source. Explore data availability →

Know which question this supplier intelligence platform answers.

CompanyDelta is the company-record layer for supplier review. It helps procurement establish which legal entity sits behind a vendor record, what supported corporate facts changed and which evidence needs human review. It does not replace the operational, cyber, ESG or screening systems that answer different questions.

Where CompanyDelta fits—and where another source is still required
Decision areaCompanyDelta evidenceKeep from another system
Supplier identityLegal name, jurisdiction, company identifier, status and available registered details.Your supplier ID, contract party, purchase orders, contacts and approved bank details.
Governance and ownershipAvailable directors, officers, shareholders, parent relationships, source dates and recorded changes.Sanctions and PEP screening, legal interpretation, declarations and enhanced due-diligence evidence.
Financial filingsNewly available statements, reported periods, currencies and comparable filed figures where supported.Credit scores, credit limits, forecasts, payment behaviour and your internal exposure.
Supplier operationsA company-record change can open a review and supply the supporting corporate evidence.Delivery, quality, service, contract, cyber, ESG, news and operational-continuity signals.

A company-record finding is evidence for a review, not a supplier-risk verdict. Combine it with your policy, relationship data and specialist sources before making a decision. For the operating model, read the supplier monitoring guide →

Define the evidence you need before you buy.

Choose a representative portfolio band and the company-record categories that matter. The planner turns those choices into a practical pilot outline. It runs in your browser; your selections are not submitted.

Company-record categories to evaluate

25–100 suppliers · 2 evidence categories

Legal identity and status; Ownership and group relationships.

  1. Match the entities. Supply country, registration number where known and your internal supplier reference.
  2. Confirm field-level coverage. Test the selected categories against the actual jurisdictions and entities in the pilot.
  3. Inspect a real exception. Retain the previous and current value, source context, dates, gaps and collection status.
  4. Agree the decision path. Name the reviewer, acceptance criteria and escalation route before recurring monitoring begins.
Request a portfolio assessment

This is a planning aid, not a coverage or volume promise. A production proposal depends on entity matching, jurisdictions, fields, sources, monitoring scope and integration requirements.

One ownership change.
The wider picture.

Northstar’s recorded corporate shareholder increases its holding. Your agent compares the records, checks the available relationships and prepares a briefing for the supplier owner.

The result connects a company-level change to your wider supplier portfolio, so your team can decide whether related suppliers also need a review.

Supplier reviewExample

Northstar Manufacturing

What changed
Alder Holdings: 40% → 65%
Portfolio context
Alder also appears in the ownership records of Meridian and Westhaven.
Supporting records
Previous and updated shareholder records, with available dates.
Next step
Ask the supplier owner to review the updated ownership information.

Prepared for your team. No supplier decision or system update has been made.

Printable sample ↗

A clear path from supplier master to reviewed evidence.

A reliable implementation preserves your supplier reference while separating identity resolution, change detection and the final business decision.

  1. 01

    Match and baseline

    Resolve each vendor record to a legal entity using country and identifiers. Retain unresolved matches and confirm field-level coverage before monitoring.

  2. 02

    Detect and investigate

    Choose supported company changes that matter to your policy. Keep previous and current values, source context, effective or filing dates, detection date and failed checks visible.

  3. 03

    Review and integrate

    Route the sourced briefing to a named owner. Record the decision, then use CSV, API or webhooks only after permissions and delivery behaviour have been tested.

Know what changed. Know what to ask.

A supplier’s trading name is only part of the picture. The registered company behind it can appoint new directors, change shareholders or publish new accounts. Bring those facts into the conversation with the person responsible for that supplier.

Examples of supplier changes and procurement follow-up
Company changeWhy procurement may review itUseful follow-up
Recorded legal status changesThe legal entity you contracted with has a different recorded status.Inspect the official record and ask the supplier owner whether the relationship needs review.
Ownership changesYour previous ownership assessment may no longer describe the current record.Compare holdings and identify other suppliers connected through the recorded shareholder.
Directors or officers changeYour governance information and supplier contacts may need checking.Review the appointment or resignation details and decide which internal records need updating.
New financial statements appearYour supplier review can use a newer reporting period.Compare available reported figures and accounting scope, then prepare questions for the supplier.

Different supplier names can share an owner.

A list of suppliers does not show whether those companies are connected. Recorded parent and shareholder relationships help your team understand where several suppliers belong to a common corporate structure.

In the example above, Alder Holdings appears in three supplier records. The ownership change is relevant to Northstar’s review, while the shared shareholder gives procurement a reason to inspect the wider relationship.

Company counts describe the recorded connections. Measuring purchasing concentration also requires your spend, contract or category data; a corporate link alone cannot establish operational dependency.

Understand the ownership evidence →

Make the pilot answer procurement’s objections.

  1. Identity accuracy. Show how ambiguous names, subsidiaries and duplicate vendor records are resolved or held for review.
  2. Coverage by field. Report usable status, governance, ownership and filing evidence for the actual countries—not a global company count.
  3. Traceable change evidence. Retain old and new values, source context, relevant dates and gaps so another reviewer can reproduce the finding.
  4. Failure visibility. Keep unmatched entities, unsupported fields and failed checks visible; a quiet feed is not proof that nothing changed.
  5. Workflow fit. Demonstrate named ownership, review states, audit history and a tested delivery path into the existing process.
  6. Decision value. Measure match resolution, useful findings, reviewer effort, false positives and actions taken—alongside qualified enquiry and conversion outcomes.
Use the supplier due diligence checklist →

Supplier intelligence, explained.

What is a supplier intelligence platform?

A supplier intelligence platform connects supplier records with external evidence and workflows so procurement can identify the legal entity, understand relevant changes and route a review. CompanyDelta focuses on registered company facts, governance, ownership, group relationships and filed financial information where available.

How does supplier monitoring support supplier due diligence?

It extends the company-record review beyond onboarding. A procurement analyst can investigate a status change, new owner or financial filing using the previous and updated records. The supplier owner then decides whether further questions, additional checks or an internal update are needed.

How is CompanyDelta different from a broad supplier risk platform?

CompanyDelta is deliberately narrower: it provides company-record identity, changes and sourced review evidence. It does not combine every operational, cyber, ESG, sanctions, news or performance signal into a composite score. Use it as an evidence layer alongside the specialist and internal systems required by your policy.

Is this a complete supplier risk monitoring platform?

No. This solution covers company records, governance, ownership and filed financial information. It does not provide a complete picture of supplier performance, delivery reliability, cyber exposure, sanctions or ESG. Use these company-record findings alongside the other information your procurement process requires.

What does the procurement AI agent actually do?

The investigation uses the available company snapshots and detected events to prepare a sourced explanation. For an ownership change, it can compare the recorded holdings and summarise the supported relationships. Your team reviews the evidence and controls the next action. Live investigations require configured data and AI connections.

Can you identify suppliers in the same corporate group?

Available parent and shareholder records can reveal corporate connections across your portfolio. A common shareholder, a recorded parent and a shared director are different types of relationship. Each needs to be presented with its evidence; a similar name or common address is not enough to establish group membership.

Can we use this with our existing supplier management system?

Keep your internal supplier reference against each matched company. Your technical team can use CSV, API and webhooks to bring company events into an existing process. Connector configuration, access permissions and delivery behaviour should be tested before a live workflow depends on them.

Does supplier intelligence include credit ratings or scores?

No. CompanyDelta uses registry and financial data, including comparisons of reported figures where available. Partner credit ratings, credit limits and composite supplier scores are outside this product. A financial movement is a reason to investigate, not a prediction of payment or delivery performance.

How frequently can suppliers be checked?

The workspace supports on-demand company checks. Recurring monitoring requires an active data connection and a configured schedule. Source updates vary by jurisdiction and dataset. A failed or incomplete check needs to remain visible so that an absence of new findings is not mistaken for a successful check.

What should procurement prove in an initial evaluation?

Start with a representative list containing country, registration number where known, internal reference and responsible owner. Measure entity-match resolution, field-level coverage, useful findings, reviewer effort, false positives and actions taken. Confirm how unsupported data and failed checks remain visible before agreeing production monitoring.

Test the evidence on your actual portfolio.

Assess legal-entity matches, field-level country coverage and the supplier changes your procurement team would review.

Request a portfolio assessment →Discuss the workflow →
CompanyDelta