Ownership questions
What changed in the recorded shareholders? Which available parent records explain the relationship? Which ownership links still need verification?
AI Due Diligence & Company Investigations
A company question.
An answer you can inspect.
Move beyond reading an alert. Investigate the available company records, compare what changed and prepare a sourced briefing for a person to review.
Investigation briefIllustrative example
“What changed in Northstar’s ownership?”
FINDING 01
A larger recorded holding.
The shareholder’s recorded holding increased from 40% to 65%.
[1] Previous record 40%
[2] Updated record 65%
Still to verify
Confirm the effective date and whether other holdings changed.
Purpose-built company intelligence
Ask a more useful company question.
Governance questions
What appointments or resignations appear in the available records? Are the identifiers sufficient to establish that two entries refer to the same person?
Financial questions
Which reporting periods and figures are available? What changed between comparable periods, and what is missing from the filed information?
A practical workflow
Follow the finding back to its source.
Frame the question
Choose the company and the question your reviewer needs to answer.
Gather the evidence
Retrieve the available source snapshots and the relevant recorded events.
Prepare cited findings
Generate findings tied to evidence references, with unanswered questions kept explicit.
Review the conclusion
Verify the records and calculations, then record your decision and proposed follow-up.
Evidence and operating boundaries
Separate findings from open questions.
A reviewable output
An investigation should contain a summary, cited findings, evidence references, data gaps and suggested next steps.
Human judgment remains essential
A generated explanation is not a registry fact or a legal conclusion. Check citations, identity matches and any material interpretation before relying on it.
Current operating status
The investigation workflow requires configured registry and AI connections. Website examples are illustrative; no general web investigation, sanctions screening or legal certification is implied.
See a concrete deliverable
Read the brief your reviewer receives.
The examples use invented company records. Review how findings, supporting excerpts, gaps and proposed actions are presented.
Open a sample review Explore supported eventsYour questions
What to know before you start
Is this automated due diligence?
It supports parts of a company-record review: retrieval, comparison and drafting. Your team remains responsible for the scope, additional checks and final decision.
What does the AI use?
The implemented workflow uses available saved company snapshots and events supplied to the configured AI service. It does not imply unrestricted access to every external source.
Can I inspect the evidence?
The investigation output retains evidence references. Open and verify the underlying records, and distinguish unavailable source documents from available record excerpts.
Can it prove beneficial ownership?
It can help investigate disclosed relationships where records are available. Ownership completeness, thresholds and legal interpretation still need an appropriately scoped human review.
Can we use our own assistant?
The separate MCP integration exposes read-only tools for saved companies, events and reviews. Assistant access, permissions and licensed AI use must be validated.
Start with your company list
See how CompanyDelta fits your review process.
Discuss your countries, company volumes and the questions your team needs to answer.